I hate the attitude that dimisses anyone who really believes in what they're talking about. I think the whole point of this was to be radical and sometimes that's what you have to be, when you're challenging something that is a totally unquestioned part of society. Its point is in its shock value and while therefore it's not 100% "correct" or whatever, that's not the
[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<i?point.</i>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]
I hate the attitude that dimisses anyone who really believes in what they're talking about. I think the whole <i>point</i> of this was to be radical and sometimes that's what you have to be, when you're challenging something that is a totally unquestioned part of society. Its point is in its shock value and while therefore it's not 100% "correct" or whatever, that's not the <i?point.</i>
no subject