ext_116297 ([identity profile] amarynth.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] labellementeuse 2006-09-19 04:19 am (UTC)

In the context it could be the implication that Davis is gay is not remarkably in and of itself but the fact that he's married to a woman implies that their marriage is somehow a sham, hence it's as valid as Brash's affair (which I'm not yet convinced of the validity of). Got to say though, I agree that Clark is giving this accusation way too much time.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting