(no subject)
Jul. 30th, 2005 10:14 pmOH OH ITEM OF COOLNESS:
Tenth Planet Discovered!
That is kind of cool. Although, you know, if Pluto is 40AU out and Planet X is 97 AU* out, is that a planet or just a supah-large Oort Cloud object? How far out is the Oort Cloud anyway?
Okay, Wikipedia Says 50,000-100,000 AU out. Which, dude, is a long way to travel for long-period comets, I never really thought about that before. Anyway. So I guess not a supermassive Oort cloud object. And it's bigger than Kuiper belt objects because they think it's bigger than Pluto which kind of sits on the fine line- some people think it's a planet, some people think it's a big Kuiper belt object.
Um, anyway. Yay, new planet? I don't really have an appropriate icon for this...
*1 AU=Astronomical Unit= distance from Earth to Sun
Tenth Planet Discovered!
That is kind of cool. Although, you know, if Pluto is 40AU out and Planet X is 97 AU* out, is that a planet or just a supah-large Oort Cloud object? How far out is the Oort Cloud anyway?
Okay, Wikipedia Says 50,000-100,000 AU out. Which, dude, is a long way to travel for long-period comets, I never really thought about that before. Anyway. So I guess not a supermassive Oort cloud object. And it's bigger than Kuiper belt objects because they think it's bigger than Pluto which kind of sits on the fine line- some people think it's a planet, some people think it's a big Kuiper belt object.
Um, anyway. Yay, new planet? I don't really have an appropriate icon for this...
*1 AU=Astronomical Unit= distance from Earth to Sun
no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 10:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 10:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 10:40 am (UTC)Well...
Date: 2005-07-30 10:45 am (UTC)Wasn't there one of these a few days ago? And one about a year ago?
This tenth planet thing seems kinda pointless unless they can figure out how many tenths there are...
no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 10:46 am (UTC)Oort, oort.
OO-Oort!
Oort.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 10:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 10:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 10:47 am (UTC)Re: Well...
Date: 2005-07-30 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 10:48 am (UTC)Re: Well...
Date: 2005-07-30 10:48 am (UTC)Re: Well...
Date: 2005-07-30 10:51 am (UTC)As a classics student I'd suggest... Um...
Date: 2005-07-30 10:53 am (UTC)It's about time he got some cosmic recognition.
Failing that, Apollo was a big news god. Though then the moon missions could get confusing. Diana?
Perhaps these more distant objects should have demi-god names? Theseus? Perseus? Hercules?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 10:54 am (UTC)Stupid leaving out words.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 11:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 11:07 am (UTC)Actually, he's really good and very funny. *recommends*
Re: As a classics student I'd suggest... Um...
Date: 2005-07-30 11:08 am (UTC)Ooh, I like Perseus, actually. But isn't that the wrong mythology? Jupiter, etc are all Roman, so that's where I'd be looking, if I were you.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 11:09 am (UTC)Re: Well...
Date: 2005-07-30 11:10 am (UTC)Re: As a classics student I'd suggest... Um...
Date: 2005-07-30 11:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 11:12 am (UTC)Re: As a classics student I'd suggest... Um...
Date: 2005-07-30 11:15 am (UTC)Re: As a classics student I'd suggest... Um...
Date: 2005-07-30 12:06 pm (UTC):P
I second your vote for Bnumber.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 12:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 01:46 pm (UTC)And, if you don't mind me saying so, that seems to be an extremely wrongheaded reason to be mortified. And somewhat indicative of a superior attitude I find sort of repellent.
A tip: if you assume everyone else knows what you know, maybe sometimes you have to stop and explain yourself, but it's a hell of a lot better than assuming you know more than everyone. Because, you know, people do not react even remotely well to that, and, furthermore, it's generally incorrect.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 09:49 pm (UTC)Basically, the Romans didn't use Heroes as divine subjects really. They had plenty of personifications but that doesn't seem right either. But Hercules? Is spelled Herakles by the Greeks, so the other way is the Latin version. See what I mean?
Most of the big name Gods are gone except for Bacchus, Apollo, Diana, Ceres (actually, isn't that something else in space?), Minerva.
Hey Minerva might be good.
But all the other planets have REASONS they are a particular Gods name whereas anything at this poiint is kinda random. Maybe once they find out some more about Bnumber we can go mythological.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 11:02 pm (UTC)Which is all totally subjective, anyway. Why make a cut-off for planet/non-planet at that particular point anyway?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-30 11:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 05:03 am (UTC)Minerva would be a cool one. I sort of think it's a shame Hermes/Mercuruy's been taken because that's definitely a wanderer, or far from home or whatever... In that vein, I like Aeneas or Odysseus, come to think of it. ;)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 08:22 am (UTC)cat
no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 08:32 am (UTC)It would go to your head.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 08:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 08:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 08:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 09:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 11:45 am (UTC)I'm not sure what other elements they use to define planets. But if its bigger, that seems enough surely?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 11:50 am (UTC)Um.. What do you mean about the Roman names thing? I was saying that the demigods were taken somewhat into Roman culture, though definately not as much as otehr ideas. Hence Herakles to Hercules. Leaving hErcules as an appropriate name. Or at least within pattern.
Actually Aeneas isn't bad, although there's a sense of origin to that. Ullyses is the Latin of Oddyseus, so it would have to be that really.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-31 09:34 pm (UTC)