(no subject)
Mar. 13th, 2007 10:22 pmI'm baaaaaaaack.
Oh computer, my Juanita, it is tragic how much I missed you and your cracked black case. You are my favourite.
Ahem.
Anyway, yeah, hit me up with what I missed, and many thanks for the advice in the last post, I really really really appreciate it and now have lots of good ideas.
What I did with my spare time: watched half of the first season of Dead Zone - verdict: enjoyable but I probably won't bother with the rest; the first disc of S5 of Friends, verdict: 100% predictable; The Devil Wears Prada, verdict: ditto but I like Anne Hathaway; The first season and a half (SO FAR) of Veronica Mars, verdict: awesome. I also, like, did some homework.
Oh yeah, I almost forgot: can anyone remind me of semi-famous recent child abuse cases here in NZ? Obviously, James Whakaruru and the Kahui twins; I'd also be really keen to get my hands on any cases reported where the "discipline" was obviously unreasonable but the parent or caregiver was acquitted.
And on that subject: in the last year, New Zealand's child abuse rate went up 7%. Maybe that's an increase in reporting rather than in actual violence; I really, really hope so. But maybe not. We have a problem in taking care of our children. I believe it is vital that we take steps to remedy this and I believe Sue Bradford's current member's bill is at least a step in the right direction. Write to your MP and tell them so if you agree, please?
Oh computer, my Juanita, it is tragic how much I missed you and your cracked black case. You are my favourite.
Ahem.
Anyway, yeah, hit me up with what I missed, and many thanks for the advice in the last post, I really really really appreciate it and now have lots of good ideas.
What I did with my spare time: watched half of the first season of Dead Zone - verdict: enjoyable but I probably won't bother with the rest; the first disc of S5 of Friends, verdict: 100% predictable; The Devil Wears Prada, verdict: ditto but I like Anne Hathaway; The first season and a half (SO FAR) of Veronica Mars, verdict: awesome. I also, like, did some homework.
Oh yeah, I almost forgot: can anyone remind me of semi-famous recent child abuse cases here in NZ? Obviously, James Whakaruru and the Kahui twins; I'd also be really keen to get my hands on any cases reported where the "discipline" was obviously unreasonable but the parent or caregiver was acquitted.
And on that subject: in the last year, New Zealand's child abuse rate went up 7%. Maybe that's an increase in reporting rather than in actual violence; I really, really hope so. But maybe not. We have a problem in taking care of our children. I believe it is vital that we take steps to remedy this and I believe Sue Bradford's current member's bill is at least a step in the right direction. Write to your MP and tell them so if you agree, please?
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 03:33 am (UTC)I am fond of quoting that one in discussions about this kind of thing because it started with him smacking her so she'd stop laughing at him.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-16 03:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 04:27 am (UTC)HAVING said that, you're a University student at Canterbury aren't you? You've got a Law school - and that means legal databases, including case law...
You may not be able to get a name, but the Law Library should be able to help you find the case.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-28 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 09:38 pm (UTC)I'm not into beating children, but Bradford's bill will do nothing to stop children being beaten. And thus it's a waste of time.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 11:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-14 03:34 am (UTC)I personally was supporting the amendment to allow light smacking only. More stringent descriptions of what is and isn't allowed ought to mean fewer abusers would escape conviction because of odd interpretations of "reasonable force" (like the whip woman). Smacking almost certainly doesn't work as a discipline system, at least not on its own, and I like to think I would never do it myself, but I don't believe in banning something simply because it isn't nice or doesn't do what it's meant to.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-15 08:23 pm (UTC)Unfortunately there are apparently procedural problems with exact definitions of what is and isn't okay but personally I'm not comfortable with enshrining any physical discipline in law as "okay" - while I don't really think parents should be convicted of abuse for a smack once in awhile, I also don't think the gvt. should be explicitly condoning those.
Curious as to what you would say about the apparent friction between assault laws for adults and the corresponding laws that say what would be an assault when performed on an adult - even to help them learn!! - is considered okay as long as you're doing it to teach your kids how to behave.
And since we both agree smacking is not effective... *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 10:43 pm (UTC)Got a reference for that?
[Personal observation doesn't match the assertion]
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 10:52 pm (UTC)However, I'm fairly sure that there is documented evidence in support of the fact that corporal punishment is least effective of all other kinds and in fact may have the opposite effect. Give me a couple of days and I'll try to track something down.