(no subject)
May. 11th, 2008 03:36 pm1. I just friended
bakebakebake. Boy, was that a dumb idea.
2. So so SO behind on comments, and I'm very sorry, but I'm just reaching that stage in a big project where like - it's due monday, and on thursday you realise you really should knuckle down to it, but you get home late and someone just leant you Farscape s4 and Peacekeeper Wars so you watch some of that and crash, and then Friday you have work in the middle of the day so you don't do anything in the morning and of course you're tired when you get home so you decide it can wait til Saturday, and on Saturday you watch just one episode of Farscape that turns into the whole season (and you also knit a whole mitten and bake a big ole batch of peanut butter chocolate chip cookies) and then it's Sunday morning and holy shit, it's due tomorrow! It's amazing how you can procrastinate by doing *nothing.*
3. Was there ever a Greek hero whose tragic flaw was procrastination? If not why not?
4. So anyway I'm trying to do SCREEDS of reading for this damn essay - which is 3,500 words which is long for a first-year class and he's all "You must show serious scholarship" blah blah crap blah, anyway we got to pick our topic and I picked Rousseau and feminism for shits and giggles. And my god there's this one critic who is just an asshole! I don't like him! At all! Joel Schwartz, The Sexual Politics of Jean-Jacques Rousseau or something - anyway, what a jerk. I'm so het up about what a jerk I think he is I'm not sure I'm going to be able to write on him while maintaining a standard of decency/ without generating into "This critic's a jerk! A jerk I say! And by the way, loser, when feminists say women should try to be independent it's not because they're evil man-haters who want to do away with men [EVEN THOUGH ROUSSEAU TOTALLY WANTED TO DO AWAY WITH WOMEN, which is funny considering how fond he was of knocking them up, the big slutty hypocrite] anyway, it's because feminists think women and men shouldn't have to relate in a way where men have all the e.g. strength power and money and women provide the e.g. breasts, housework and uteri."
Jerkoff. Also, heterosexist jerkoff. Parenting is not restricted to man/woman, wanker. (NB: he doesn't say it should be, but it's a fundamental relationship he uses to examine JJR's sexual politics.) And I can't get all angry because I only have time to read the introduction and conclusion and what if I miss a stunning treatise on women's rights and LGBTQ rights and single parent rights in the middle? (I don't think so though, because I skimmed the notes and the index and there's a lot of stuff about how women are bad at math and shouldn't be in the army.)
2. So so SO behind on comments, and I'm very sorry, but I'm just reaching that stage in a big project where like - it's due monday, and on thursday you realise you really should knuckle down to it, but you get home late and someone just leant you Farscape s4 and Peacekeeper Wars so you watch some of that and crash, and then Friday you have work in the middle of the day so you don't do anything in the morning and of course you're tired when you get home so you decide it can wait til Saturday, and on Saturday you watch just one episode of Farscape that turns into the whole season (and you also knit a whole mitten and bake a big ole batch of peanut butter chocolate chip cookies) and then it's Sunday morning and holy shit, it's due tomorrow! It's amazing how you can procrastinate by doing *nothing.*
3. Was there ever a Greek hero whose tragic flaw was procrastination? If not why not?
4. So anyway I'm trying to do SCREEDS of reading for this damn essay - which is 3,500 words which is long for a first-year class and he's all "You must show serious scholarship" blah blah crap blah, anyway we got to pick our topic and I picked Rousseau and feminism for shits and giggles. And my god there's this one critic who is just an asshole! I don't like him! At all! Joel Schwartz, The Sexual Politics of Jean-Jacques Rousseau or something - anyway, what a jerk. I'm so het up about what a jerk I think he is I'm not sure I'm going to be able to write on him while maintaining a standard of decency/ without generating into "This critic's a jerk! A jerk I say! And by the way, loser, when feminists say women should try to be independent it's not because they're evil man-haters who want to do away with men [EVEN THOUGH ROUSSEAU TOTALLY WANTED TO DO AWAY WITH WOMEN, which is funny considering how fond he was of knocking them up, the big slutty hypocrite] anyway, it's because feminists think women and men shouldn't have to relate in a way where men have all the e.g. strength power and money and women provide the e.g. breasts, housework and uteri."
Jerkoff. Also, heterosexist jerkoff. Parenting is not restricted to man/woman, wanker. (NB: he doesn't say it should be, but it's a fundamental relationship he uses to examine JJR's sexual politics.) And I can't get all angry because I only have time to read the introduction and conclusion and what if I miss a stunning treatise on women's rights and LGBTQ rights and single parent rights in the middle? (I don't think so though, because I skimmed the notes and the index and there's a lot of stuff about how women are bad at math and shouldn't be in the army.)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-11 04:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-11 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-11 04:09 am (UTC)Seriously though. He was a fucking genius in a lot of ways...his political theories are, if not necessarily applicable, fascinating. I mean he basically invented socialism, if I recall correctly. But then there's the women thing. And the fact that he was a complete crazy.
Your critic sounds like a charmer too XD My best essays have been written when I was pissed about the topic, if it helps.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-11 04:14 am (UTC)He didn't really invent socialism - I mean, AFAI can tell it's related but much of what Rousseau wanted isn't really comparable to any kind of current political philosophy because he just doesn't believe in things like representative politics, or party politics, and a bunch of other things - I mean he thinks all government should be done in person ffs. I can see the relationship though because he also thinks that in a social contract we're subject to a general will, the only good things are things for the public good, etc. And then OTOH the "cult of person-hood" and emphasis on individualism comes if not straight from him then very significantly from him. But yeah, basically he was a complete crazy and I really regret deciding to write on him.
He is, he is! I really want to find some scathing rebuttal of him but google scholar has nothing so far.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-11 04:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-11 04:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-11 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-11 06:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-12 03:57 am (UTC)Can I join the party?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-12 04:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-12 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-12 05:23 am (UTC)(sniff)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-11 02:27 pm (UTC)However, I fully believe that once you study math, you are totally on the bottom of the university scale of loser majors. Once you study math, you can go no lower. I say that lovingly because I am also a maths student . . .
no subject
Date: 2008-05-11 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-12 08:38 am (UTC)also, MITTENS!