HEY LISTEN UP

[labellementeuse]

SO it seems that Murray McCully, minister for foreign affairs & trade, is going to merge NZAID (the new zealand aid agency) back into MFAT (ministry of foreign etc). This is basically a real disaster for our aid funding because it means aid will become contingent on politics, something that is basically really bad for the Pacific (where most of our aid goes.) It is really in our interest to have a strong and flourising Pacific - the Pacific is our home; we have to look our for the people who share our gardens, kitchen, and our plumbing (man, this metaphor sucks so bad!)

Anyway, NZAID is less than a decade old, it was innovational and based on a strong report from people whose names I forget about the value of our then-political not-thought-well-of aid agency. Since it was disassociated from MFAT it has gained rather a good reputation and considered a leader in the OECD. National want to merge it back - well, I'm not totally sure why, because it's working pretty well - not perfect, but a hell of a lot better than it was before it was merged.

What can we do? The decision's kind of already been made. But WELLINGTONIANS!!!!! MEET OUTSIDE THE MAIN ENTRANCE OF THE LAW SCHOOL (pipitea conference, by the railway stn) TOMORROW (1ST OF MAY) AT 12PM TO EXPRESS YOUR DISAPPROVAL. If you can take half an hour from your lunchbreak to swing by between 12:15-12:30ish - please do. If you can make signs - please do.

Crossposting to wellingtonnz, sorry kids who get it 2x.

Comments

[amarynth.livejournal.com]

I've got to admit, I mentally winced when you mentioned "arrive at universal suffrage at their own speed". I imagine you didn't feel too comfortable writing it either. The problem here (other than the fact that universal suffrage is not any kind of endpoint) is that even if we accept that achieving democracy may depend on culture (and that's hard for me to accept, even as for he sake of the argument) it's hard to tell when this is genuinely the case and when it's simply ideological pettifogging employed by native elites to stem foreign criticism. (Not that any dictatorial regime ever lost power due to foreign finger-wagging, admittedly)

I can see what you're getting at, and I absolutely agree that raising the living standards of people in poverty should have nothing to do with whether or not their government is acceptable (whatever we consider acceptable). If anything, an impoverished populace is usually easier for an oligarchy to control. However, having said that, it doesn't necessarily follow that an institutionally separate aid agency is 100% necessary to ensure that sort of policy. And I've got to say, the difference between a 'diplomat' and a 'development professional' is not necessarily that profound.

But this is all by way of devil's advocacy. Personally I think overseas aid is easily the most important part of foreign policy, and I would like to see NZAID stay, for what it -could- be if not what it actually is. Sadly, I can't come to the protest because I have to meet with my supervisor at midday (and my thesis will change the world for the better, honest), but I've passed it on to people I know who might want to. I hope it goes well. A post-protest LJ report would be appreciated. But I know you're a busy person. :-)