![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
labellementeuseNope, I don't really wanna talk about it.
GPAs:
French 81
History 80
English 75
Physics 67
Calculus 58
... I suppose I got them all.
Anyway, good things: I TOTALLY GOT AN EXCELLENCE AND A MERIT FOR THE HISTORY ESSAYS I PWN YOU. <3
And, and, I didn't get French schol but
I GOT ENGLISH SCHOL
OMG
!!
So yeah. *thrilled*
Bad things (only one, really) I failed two calc papers. >.< I really thought I'd done better than that. So bleeyah. But, I got 13 credits for it.. kinda annoys me because it's not 14 but it's enough. And that was all I failed.
GPAs:
French 81
History 80
English 75
Physics 67
Calculus 58
... I suppose I got them all.
Anyway, good things: I TOTALLY GOT AN EXCELLENCE AND A MERIT FOR THE HISTORY ESSAYS I PWN YOU. <3
And, and, I didn't get French schol but
I GOT ENGLISH SCHOL
OMG
!!
So yeah. *thrilled*
Bad things (only one, really) I failed two calc papers. >.< I really thought I'd done better than that. So bleeyah. But, I got 13 credits for it.. kinda annoys me because it's not 14 but it's enough. And that was all I failed.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Re: failed schmailed
Date: 2005-01-10 05:58 am (UTC)As to minor status, m'lud, the prosecution would like to refer to the postings of 27th December 2004 (http://www.livejournal.com/users/labellementeuse/68005.html) and 30th December 2004 (http://www.livejournal.com/users/labellementeuse/69557.html), especially the comments referring to the defendent's taste for "slash" fiction. ... No, m'lud, I am relaibly informed that I can't understand "slash" fiction either, due to my possession of a willy, apparently. I fear, m'lud, that the defendent has forgotten momentarily (due to the presence of a 'dropkick' and the reception of rather good exam results) that the court can read her back journal and judge for themselves her claim to "minor status".
Quite right, m'lud and well said.
Re: failed schmailed: Rysade
Date: 2005-01-10 10:31 am (UTC)Re: failed schmailed: Rysade
Date: 2005-01-10 08:37 pm (UTC)Looking at that booklist, "Atlas Shrugged" is the other Ayn Rand worth reading, although "The Fountainhead" is better written, IMHO.
You might want to look also at "Guns, Germs and Steel" by Jared Diamond (http://www.wwnorton.com/catalog/spring99/gunsgerms.htm) which I found fascinating.
Re: failed schmailed
Date: 2005-01-10 05:55 pm (UTC)And there's nothing wrong with slash! NC-17, I can see how you could argue that in a court of law, but there's a lot of G slash out there!
... or anyway, PG. Bleeyah.
Re: failed schmailed
Date: 2005-01-10 08:18 pm (UTC)And you're trying to tell me you never,ever read any slash that wasn't PG???
In the words of the prophet, "Yeah, right!"
Bleargh, indeed.
Re: failed schmailed
Date: 2005-01-11 01:44 am (UTC)Re: failed schmailed
Date: 2005-01-11 04:05 am (UTC)Friend away. But be warned that I'm not inclined to give any quarter, and might well be described as "religious-tolerant" rather than particularly "christian-friendly". Also, I comment more than I post, generally.
But any friend of Tui's is bound to be a least a little strange ;-) so welcome aboard.
Re: failed schmailed
Date: 2005-01-11 05:26 am (UTC)A little strange? Hehe, I take it as a compliment! Where abouts are you from in NZ?
Re: failed schmailed
Date: 2005-01-11 07:09 am (UTC)The debates will happen when appropriate. ;-)
I'm in Wellington, the only town that matters [heh heh]
Re: failed schmailed
Date: 2005-01-11 07:48 am (UTC)It's practically a law or something.
Re: failed schmailed
Date: 2005-01-11 09:52 am (UTC)Re: failed schmailed
Date: 2005-01-11 09:00 am (UTC)Re: failed schmailed
Date: 2005-01-11 04:13 am (UTC)Um. No. I'm not. I'm just saying that slash, of its nature, isn't bad. There's bad slash out there, is all. ;)
*snickers*