(no subject)
Nov. 16th, 2009 03:37 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
1. "I think it's a kiwi." "Don't they only live in Australia or New Zealand?" *sob*
2. On "Ms." Not the magazine, the title. If I could make one single absolute change to the world, it would probably be Ms. Mrs. would be gone and Miss would be like Master - on the way out. I know that is a pretty bourgeois English-speaking problem, and obviously I could say, end poverty, hunger, violence. But I think those things are symptoms, not the disease, ad I think curing the disease is going to take more than one change. So: Ms.
Here are some of the things I think about Ms.
"Miss" implies this: You're a woman. You're unmarried. You probably don't have dependents and in fact might be dependent upon others. You're probably young = naive, and/or young = irresponsible, and/or young = don't need promotions/careers instead of jobs/pay raises.
"Mrs." implies this: You're a heterosexual woman. You're married. You're dependent (or codependent) upon others. You also have a good chance of having dependents, who might cause you to take time off work to go pick them up from school, look after them when they're sick, etc. This means you probably shouldn't get responsibilities in case you can't fulfill them because of that, even though you are more responsible than that Miss. You're dependent so you probably don't need that pay raise.
"Mr." implies this: You're a man and you're an adult.
Why would you let people who know, potentially, nothing about you than your name have all that extra information about you?
And these are only the most practical, boring reasons. For reasons that actually make me angry, check out a person paper on purity in language.
2. On "Ms." Not the magazine, the title. If I could make one single absolute change to the world, it would probably be Ms. Mrs. would be gone and Miss would be like Master - on the way out. I know that is a pretty bourgeois English-speaking problem, and obviously I could say, end poverty, hunger, violence. But I think those things are symptoms, not the disease, ad I think curing the disease is going to take more than one change. So: Ms.
Here are some of the things I think about Ms.
"Miss" implies this: You're a woman. You're unmarried. You probably don't have dependents and in fact might be dependent upon others. You're probably young = naive, and/or young = irresponsible, and/or young = don't need promotions/careers instead of jobs/pay raises.
"Mrs." implies this: You're a heterosexual woman. You're married. You're dependent (or codependent) upon others. You also have a good chance of having dependents, who might cause you to take time off work to go pick them up from school, look after them when they're sick, etc. This means you probably shouldn't get responsibilities in case you can't fulfill them because of that, even though you are more responsible than that Miss. You're dependent so you probably don't need that pay raise.
"Mr." implies this: You're a man and you're an adult.
Why would you let people who know, potentially, nothing about you than your name have all that extra information about you?
And these are only the most practical, boring reasons. For reasons that actually make me angry, check out a person paper on purity in language.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 03:02 am (UTC)Also, hahaha, I love that paper, although I'm pretty certain it's aimed at laypeople--talk about language purity to a linguist and they turn their nose up at you and call you a prescriptivist.
(...that's another one: I want it to be acceptable to use "they" in the singular. The usage has a long history! I do not understand why we persist in insisting it's wrong. English needs a gender-neutral third person singular that isn't disrespectful.)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 03:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 04:53 am (UTC)It is acceptable! The OED says so!1
1For certain editions of the OED.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 08:27 pm (UTC)I kind of don't like "they", but I agree that introducing a gender-neutral pronoun would be good (and as China said, it is generally acceptable, I think.) Because I don't like "they" and am too nervous to use "zie", I usually go for "she".
no subject
Date: 2009-11-18 04:58 am (UTC)Also, that bird looks nothing like a kiwi, what the hell?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 04:55 am (UTC)*criez*
On "Ms."
A world of yes. And telemarketers always call up and ask for "Mrs [surname]", and it drives me nuts! *rage-stompyfeet* Otoh, it means that any time anyone calls up for "Mrs [surname]" I can tell them they have the wrong number and hang up immediately. :-P
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 08:29 pm (UTC)Heheh, I usually get angry with them and say "there is no Mrs. Head here. There are three Ms. Heads. Which one are you looking for?" Be specific, y'all.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 05:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 08:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 02:33 pm (UTC)My marital status is completely totally none of anyone's business unless they're paying me/my family benefits. Then I should just be able to check a box that indicates that and not go by Mrs at all. blah.
I'm not sure how I feel about changing my last name though. --'' I think I wouldn't want to, but I wouldn't be so adamant as to not come to a compromise over it.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 08:33 pm (UTC)Um. I sort of feel strongly about that! :P
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 09:35 pm (UTC)I used to feel really strongly about that, but my current boyfriend is pretty adamant about whoever he marries taking his last name, and I don't feel so strongly about it that I'd break up with him over it because he's definitely worth it, 310%. Or maybe 1000%. Or just infinity %.
Maybe that sounds really pathetic to you, but seriously - that's my perogative and I'm not changed at all by it.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 07:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 09:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 09:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-18 05:08 am (UTC)